Bending Representations

Here's a very well-studied construction that I think everyone should know, called bending representations.  I'll start with the algebraic picture, and then get into the relationship with topology.  (At the end we'll hopefully prove that a splice of two knots in the three-sphere has positive dimensional SU(2) character variety.)  

 First, recall that given a group G, an SU(2) representation is just a homomorphism \rho: G \to SU(2).  The representation variety is R(G) = Hom(G,SU(2)).  Now SU(2) acts on R(G) by conjugation: for A \in SU(2), define \rho^A(g) = A \rho(g) A^{-1}.  We define the SU(2) character variety of G, \chi(G), to be the quotient of R(G) by conjugation.  Note that \rho^{\pm Id} = \rho. A representation \rho is irreducible if \rho^A = \rho implies A = \pm I.  For some motivation to those topologically inclined, one of the Kirby problems is to prove that every homology three-sphere other than S^3 admits an irreducible SU(2) representation.   On the other hand, if \rho has abelian image, then \rho is not irreducible; indeed every non-trivial abelian subgroup of SU(2) is \{\pm I\} or a conjugate of S^1, i.e. the subgroup of diagonal matrices.  If the image of \rho is \{ \pm I\}, then the stabilizer of \rho is all of SU(2); if it is a conjugate of S^1, then that subgroup will be the stabilizer.  

Now, suppose you have two representations \rho: G \to SU(2) and \rho': G' \to SU(2).  Then you can build a new representation out of \rho, \rho', such as \rho* \rho' : G * G' \to SU(2).  However, you can build lots of other representations.  For each A \in SU(2), then we can also define a new SU(2)-representation of G * G' by \rho^A * \rho'.  If \rho, \rho' are irreducible, then \rho^A * \rho' will not be conjugate to \rho^B * \rho' for any A \neq \pm B.  As a result, if G, G' admit irreducible representations, then the character variety of G * G' has a positive dimensional component by varying over A in SU(2)/\pm I.  (For context, it can happen that G has irreducible representations, but \chi(G) is 0-dimensional.  I.e. the only way to continuously deform a representation is to conjugate.  This happens for the fundamental groups of the Brieskorn spheres \Sigma(p,q,r) for example.)  

We can do a slightly fancier version of this.  Suppose H is a subgroup that embeds in G and G'.  Then if \rho: G \to SU(2) and \rho': G' \to SU(2) agree on H, then by the universal property of amalgamated products, we get a representation \rho *_H \rho' of G *_H G'.  (Basically, for a word in the amalgamated product, do \rho on G-letters and \rho' on G'-letters, and since they agree on H-letters, this is well-defined.)  

 Let's now additionally assume H is abelian (e.g. think G, G' are the fundamental groups of knot complements and H is the peripheral subgroup, generated by the meridian and longitude and isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}^2.)  In this case, there's a subgroup \Gamma \subset SU(2) conjugate to S^1 such that \rho|_H is stabilized by \Gamma.  (This is because \rho(H) is an abelian subgroup of SU(2), and so it's stabilized by either SU(2) or a subgroup conjugate to S^1.)  That means that \rho^A *_H \rho' is a representation of G *_H G'.  Now, if \rho is irreducible, then \rho is not stabilized by \Gamma even though \rho|_H is.  If \rho' is also irreducible, then \rho^A *_H \rho' will not be conjugate to \rho^B *_H \rho' for A \neq \pm B with A, B \in \Gamma.  Hence, \chi(G *_H G') has dimension at least 1, since \Gamma is 1-dimensional.  This is a good example of bending \rho *_H \rho' to produce lots of new representations of this interesting group. 

Who cares?  Suppose that K, K' are non-trivial knots in S^3.  In this paper, Zentner uses gauge theory to prove that there exist irreducible representations \rho : \pi_1(S^3 - K) \to SU(2) and \rho': \pi_1(S^3 - K') \to SU(2) such that \rho(\mu_K) = \rho'(\lambda_{K'}) and \rho(\lambda_K) = \rho'(\mu_{K'}).  If Y(K,K') denotes the splice of K and K', i.e. glue the exteriors of K and K' together by exchanging meridian and longitude, then a representation \rho of \pi_1(S^3 - K) and \rho' of \pi_1(S^3 - K') such that \rho(\mu_K) = \rho'(\lambda_{K'}) and \rho(\lambda_K) = \rho'(\mu_{K'}) induces a representation of \pi_1(Y(K,K')) = \pi_1(S^3 - K) *_{\mathbb{Z}^2} \pi_1(S^3 - K').  By bending, we get that the character variety of Y(K,K') has positive dimension!  (This is cool!  For example, it shows us that the dimension of the character variety knows the difference between the Brieskorn spheres \Sigma(p,q,r) and knot splices!)

Here's an even cooler converse to our discussion.  Say Y is a homology sphere (more restrictive than necessary), and \dim \chi(Y) > 0, then Y must contain an essential surface!  This is a consequence of Culler-Shalen theory.  (For more details, see these notes.)  

In general, the dimension of the representation or character variety can contain a lot of useful information, especially if one works with more general Lie groups.  For example, this is a key part of Agol's proof that ribbon concordance is a partial order.

 

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Negotiating job offers

Weird hair and mathematicians

Comparison inequalities